Dionysus Drunk (Yiannis Tsaroychis, 1972)
My mind has like 50+ tabs open at all times, and I just travel through them at ‘x’ amount of speed— gradually, the multiplicity of tabs attain the velocity of pure abstraction.
Nietzsche's Zarathustra cannot give the human beings of the town the last-living human & will therefore never become their version of the Overman’s gift. His mouth wasn't for their ears as the becoming was what was an oblivious endeavour for mankind. Humankind simply asks Zarathustra for the Overman- the Superhuman, instead of becoming what Zarathustra prophesied to mankind. The Overman is the gift produced as a result of going under and crossing over the man who cannot manifest as the content of the Earth unless the man goes under to cross over.
Schopenhauer's way of philosophizing catastrophe is a veritable and thoroughly examined manifestation of the outrageous change attendant with the present day innovation. The war against nature has finished with people turning out to be completely accountable for the human condition. It isn't Homo sapiens who needed to overhaul the world to be compassionate yet rather some sort of a Homo generator, who acknowledges in omnipresent life approach or its craft. Hence, from media to biotechnology & how to live satisfyingly under any circumstance whatsoever. Schopenhauer comprehended the singularity of the affairs of mankind i.e., the being-with in every one of us. There is no will outside, just, by definition, a deceptive portrayal or representation i.e., the will in me wakes up & apprehends its realization altogether.
Jane Marcet is known for advocating logic-based chemical & scientific standards, notably crafted by scientist Humphry Davy. As is plainly shown by the numerous reprintings, Marcet's Discussions on Science was stunningly famous. The book was as follows outlined as a discussion.
According to William James, the interest for congruity has, over science- substantiated itself to have genuine prophetic power. We should ourselves genuinely attempt each conceivable method of imagining the beginning of awareness with the goal that it may not seem comparable to its irruption into the universe of another nature, non-existent up to that point.
Deleuze & Guattari instruct us that ‘desire’ is collected & massed over a long period via our encounters. This accumulation is the getting of unmistakable pieces without losing their particularity thus becoming incorporated into a unique entirety. This is the thing that records for the assortment, intricacy, and logical inconsistency of the want & how to want goes after differentiating real factors, even at the same time.
In Sartrean notions, to envision, cognizance should be liberated from all particular realty & this opportunity should have the option to characterize itself by a being-in-the-world which is immediately the constitution & the refutation of the world.
On account of Nietzsche, everything is dark, as Jung obviously conceded. Jung most certainly felt the danger of such lack of definition, which could equal or even overpower his lucidity, as the Will to Power has shown. As I would see it, a superior mediator would be Freud. Jung is too normed i.e., he should make rules and wanted to keep them enduring (as one could understand via his Red Book).
In Beauvoir’s ethics of ambiguity, she states that Disappointment is a state of life- one can never fantasise about disposing of it without quickly longing for death. This doesn't imply that one should agree to an obstacle- instead one should agree to battle against it without rest.
Postmodernism is, to put it plainly, a dismissal of straightforwardness. (Meta)narratives simplify everything, and postmodernists will scrutinize these stories. In addressing straightforwardness, one makes certain individuals miserable one advances a presence that may come up short on the solace of cultural development or two. Keep in mind, the postmodernist doesn't loathe you. It's unquestionably not close to home.
After Zarathustra’s dialogue w/ the Saint in the woods, when he thought to himself whether the saint had heard the news that ‘God is Dead’— he was pointing out that the news is in fact ‘God’s destruction’ via the enlightenment era.
Zarathustra's Three Metamorphoses entails that the Spirit via its strength gets carried by the Camel through the loneliest desert where the Second Metamorphosis begins. Here the Lion resides, who has mastered the desert as a predatory animal for Creation wherein the Child resides.
Democracy (Derrida) is consistently a majority rule government to come. No real existing popular government is sufficient to the tension that is put on it. It's a memory- a guarantee, something we are spooky by, something we want w/ a craving past want, daring to dream.
The reason Einstein liked Spinoza so much was that he considered him to be the first modern philosopher that introduced Monism i.e., a symbiosis of Mind & Body i.e., one substance. Spinoza called it Nature interchangeably with ‘God’, hence, he could surpass as a pantheist.
On account of Ophiocordyceps, a tainted insect's conduct can be considered as parasitic conduct. The stranglehold, highest point illness, are expanded attributes of the parasite, part of its drawn-out aggregate. Ophiocordyceps leaves an engraving on the planet as fossilized scars on the underside of leaves. Terence McKenna- an advocate of this view, declared that the mushroom could de be anticipated to talk i.e., 'smoothly of itself in the cool evening of the brain'.
Lyotard on Postmodernism:
The Jungian Archetypal Series incorporates female, manly, or juvenile arrangements, just like an animal, a vegetable & even rudimentary or sub-atomic successions. Throughout Jung's work, a course of mimesis united nature & culture in its net via analogies of extent.
Søren Kierkegaard (1813) was reacting to Hegel's thought that mankind is enchained to certainty, by which human awareness is important for the climate that decides it through the constant authentic turn of events. In The Concept of Anxiety, Kierkegaard was a primary thinker who portrayed the instance of somebody remaining upon a precipice edge or on a tall structure. They experience two feelings of trepidation I.e., a) Falling, related to not having any desire to pass on, & b) dizziness.
The matter is nothing else except for the mind seen in a harmony of its exercises. There is no reason to show finally how, through this disposal of all dualism, or all genuine resistance among psyche & matter, as the last option is viewed only as of the brain in a blunt state.
According to Schelling, Matter as the last option is viewed only as of the brain in a state of bluntness, or the previous, on the other hand, like an issue only in turning into- a term is set to a large group of baffling enquiries concerning the relationship of the two.
The Cartesian Solution isn't to confess an oath of itself- the Human Idea in its Factual Reality yet to put together it with respect to an Idea which has itself totality. The association b/w embodiment & presence isn't found in experience but in the possibility of the limitless.
Within the possibility of the Limitless- Valid in the final resort is that the Insightful Reflection totally lays on a Closed-minded Thought of Being & that in this sense it doesn't add up to a demonstration of self-disclosure. (Merleau-Ponty)
-Sanjana Singh | 01.12.2021